Join us in the search for Free Energy. Share your experiments and discoveries, post your build logs, and discuss.

We have a strict No-Troll policy. So you can post without fear of being ridiculed.

New Members- Check Your Spam Folder For Activation Link

Please read our Rules. Any problems or suggestions- Contact Us

 


Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Mac's Figuera Thread
Not much luck making the resistive disk, but I came up with a simple circuit to make the single polarity waves with resistance / impedance. I suppose it's more of  impedance but it restricts current flow like resistance.

I built a test circuit and the results were encouraging..  The advantage of this method is that it uses no resistors to burn away heat.  The  impedance causing component allows me to harvest most the energy back instead of burning it..

   

  1. Mosfet 1 closes while Mosfet 2 is open.  Current flows to the capacitor until the current stops.  The cap Negative lead feeds the transformers primary.  Then out of the transformer back to the battery.

  2. The cap in series causes a growing then declining wave, And can be shaped with the timing of the mosfet and cap value.  So this single polarity wave is caused by added  impedance, which should be equivalent to distance.

  3. When the Cap is filled, Mosfet 1 Opens at the same time Mosfet 2 Closes.  The Capacitor is then connected to a Boost Converter which drains the capacitors stored power back to the battery.  

  4. Finally the primary circuit gets a diode from the Hot lead of the cap to the negative lead of the primary inductor, so the counter EMF of the transformer can return to the coil even though the powering circuit is broken.

I was able to verify the xformer output resembles a 2 polarity sinewave as expected and measurable current indeed dumps back to the battery.  

Now obviously on a system like this we want to increase frequency,  but it is not as easy as just faster switching.  The frequency is dependent on the capacity of the cap, because it has to fill and empty each cycle.  So the switching delays need to be dialed into the capacitor value used..

My first build was all soldered and I was switching hot-side like the diagram shows.  Because it was soldered in, I can not easily swap caps to increase frequency, and I was using a 1,000uf cap, so the frequency was very slow.  Even so, the output to input efficiency was not bad at all.  When dialed in, I saw upward of 70% efficiency.  

I am going to re-build with N channel mosfets with terminals so I can swap the cap around easily to increase switching speed.  

One may ask, what's the point in all this..  It is my hope the impedance will mimic the rotor pulling away, thus limiting the CEMF back to the primary when the input wave is declining from peak to zero. And using the capacitor allows me to collect that energy back.

I will try to show some videos once I get it re-built
Reply
Schematic Changed, But will be changing again.  This is the current setup

   

Here is a video in operation with my thoughts, scope shots, and future plans

Reply
What they don't tell you about induction..

Don't really care what anyone says, almost every test I do confirms my hypothesis..

~~~~~  --->   Mutual induction---  >>>   the amount of energy you take out of the system gets "Mutually Induced" back to the primary circuit..    And It CAN be Captured..




In a standard circuit, the Equal and Opposite Reaction (RECIPROCAL POWER) goes to the NEGATIVE of the battery or source.  

If the Source Positive Chamber does not Completely Empty, the Negative Source Chamber Can NOT exceed the potential of the positive side. 

The Capacitors storage Capacitance (uF) in regards to the transformers specs is crucial.
Reply
(12-21-2023, 12:48 PM)Jim Mac Wrote: I had a thread in the past that was taken down, but this one is here to stay.  I am working on several projects that are all related, but I want to circle back to this..

Here is the Gist..

A generator or dynamo induces 2 polarity output using 1 polarity in motion.  A NORTH Pole passing a coil induces a North AND a South.  I believe this is the key..  One Equals Two



just wanted to clear something up here, unless its already clear to everyone here.
when a magnet pole approaches the face of a coil, the magnets pole induces, flux cuts, the incoming side of the coil first, giving us say a positive half of the sine wave. once the mags pole reaches tdc, both sides of the windings are being induced, flux cut, at the same time, so we have zero out at tdc. then as the magnet continues and is departing the coil, the flux is cutting more of that side of the windings, thus giving us a neg portion of the sine wave.

im sure many have seen where a mag pole is crossing a coil on the side, coil 90deg compared to the above, we get mostly a positive or neg wave with each pass of the magnet, depending on the polarity of all. this is because the magnet is mostly flux cutting just one side of the windings..... 

mags
Reply
I was messing around and found a way to make what seems to be perfect single polarity waves.  These waves meet these demands:

1.  They are utilizing impedance (akin to resistance) for the retraction.
2.  I am able to perfectly control 2 of these waves to have any phase relationship. Including Figuera's growing / shrinking waves
3. They are Single Polarity waves
5. The entire circuit along with both waves can all be created from a single battery or DC source. 
6. The frequency is perfectly and easily controllable.
7. All parts are off-the-shelf.  No soldering, coding, or complicated stuff.  Just basic connections and settings.
8. Completely solid state.  No motor or commutator.
9.  (ADDED)  The coils hookup the exact same as the Figuera device with the grounds of each coil connected together- which go to the negative of the single battery.

   

I will proceed to build new Figuera triplet coils now.  Starting with 1 triplet to test.

Edit-  I will have to build a minimum of 2 triplets to test..  I wound 1 primary and it came out to 2.3 Ω which is too low for the circuit.  But 2 triplets in series puts me in the low end of the safe-zone.
Reply
GO Jim GO
I am keeping all my fingers crossed! 
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register at the forum by clicking here to see images. Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register at the forum by clicking here to see images. Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register at the forum by clicking here to see images.
Reply
First anomaly I want to show..  I have seen this before on another Figuera setup and have discussed with Escumo..  This same effect is showing up here.

Within the closed circuit:   

0.853 DC amps coming from the supply
1.588 DC Amps coming out of the Electromagnet Grounds.. 



As I mentioned several times now,  many of Buforn's patents show some symbol exactly at this spot..  (where the extra current manifests)

   
Reply
(10-20-2024, 09:53 AM)Jim Mac Wrote: Primera anomalía que quiero mostrar. He visto esto antes en otra configuración de Figuera y lo he discutido con Escumo. Este mismo efecto se muestra aquí.

Dentro del circuito cerrado:   

0,853 amperios de CC provenientes de la fuente de alimentación
1,588 amperios de CC provenientes de las conexiones a tierra del electroimán. 



Como mencioné varias veces, muchas de las patentes de Buforn muestran algún símbolo exactamente en este lugar (donde se manifiesta la corriente adicional).
Buenas tardes, efectivamente hemos hablado largo y tendido de este efecto, pero aún no hemos llegado al meollo del asunto. Espero seguir hablando del tema de Figuera y más concretamente del mecanismo de ganancia. Para mí, la masa de hierro es la responsable de esto, pero Jim nos acaba de mostrar, en su último vídeo, un triplete, sin núcleo. ¡Ánimo Jim! Sigue con tus pruebas, vas por buen camino.
Reply
Hey Escumo..

There are cores in my triplets.  But they only go through the center coil and part way into the electromagnets like Buforn's patents show..

   

I tried Full cores, but the output is much lower when the cores go all the way through.  Full cores seem to mess up the magnetism of the metal
Reply
Hey Jim, I believe I have an answer as to why you are seeing the current on the negative. But I'd need to see how you've wired it up to be sure.

What you've done is create a current sink! By only offering up half a wave to create a field, the ether is kindly adding in the missing negative bit.

I'm not quite sure if this happens at the moment of induction of the first coil or the moment of reaction by the middle coil or at counter reaction by the first coil.

Oscillating over the bloch wall is where the magic is, you're tapping ether there.

You put in a half wave and got a whole one back!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)