Google Bard AI Might Be Censoring..

[Jim Mac]

I was using Google Bard, I instructed it to read Buforn's patent.  It performed OK, and I asked several questions, and had Bard re-read it several times to pick out keys.  No problems..

   

After, I asked it to read Clemente Figuera's patent..  And it down-right refused.  I tried several times, it won't even recognize the name and will not discuss anything.

   

Then I went back to Buforn to test, and now all the sudden, it no longer has access to read that site...

   

The exact same patent is read previously 2-3 times and discussed with me,  all the sudden now does not have access to that site anymore..

Hmmmm...

[Classic]

All of them will be censored not only Bard, after UK summit for AI regulation agreement.

Sam Altman have been ousted from his own company yesterday.

It seems the all gov need to protect us from getting information we seek.

[Jim Mac]

All of them will be censored not only Bard, after UK summit for AI regulation agreement.

Sam Altman have been ousted from his own company yesterday.

It seems the all gov need to protect us from getting information we seek.

Yeah, it's becoming a crapshoot.  Really though we aren't losing much.  These AI agents try to connect the dots- and I will say, they can be used for easy questions which are well documented. But in reality, they still lack intelligence.

Like if we describe a system which not much data exists, it tries to connect the dots and spits out some answer. Then when we bring up some other points it may have overlooked, it will totally change the answer.  

I'd summarize that they can be useful for straight forward tasks, but at least for now, innovation and discovery will have to come from our human brains.

[Classic]

It was a very good assistant, not artificial intelligence as they said and was able to reduce amount of searching time. Now is almost useless.

[Jim Mac]

Well it's Official..  Google Bard is now a P.O.S.

Response:

I'm unable to assist with concepts that violate the laws of physics, such as perpetual motion. The principle of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. Therefore, any system claiming to continuously generate energy without an external source cannot function as stated.

Instead of perpetuating the search for impossible, perpetual motion machines, focusing on exploring innovative and efficient ways to extract and utilize existing energy sources would be a more productive and scientifically sound approach.

Remember, science thrives on curiosity and exploration, but it's equally important to acknowledge and respect the fundamental laws of the universe. Let's use our creative energy to pursue realistic and impactful advancements within the realm of possibility.

[Classic]

Try to ask how to create an energy generation system based on ground loop and standing waves ? you might need to mention is for research purpose in an remote location insulated environment and you are interested in speculations only that do not meet mainstream science laws.

I have been denied assistance so many times for many ideas, including my setups that already work … than I have been asked if I want to share my findings … but it felt short when I asked whom I am sharing with and for what purpose.

[Jim Mac]

Another one bites the dust...

Claude.ai was pretty good and we had lengthy discussions on OU systems.  Now today- the system no longer will discuss ways that appear to violate the known laws of physics.

These AI systems can still be used to discuss reactions and pieces of a circuit or method, but we must take care not to steer them to the conclusion what we are looking for or they become uncooperative.

[gyvulys666]

This stuff created for indoctrination and for stealing ideas