Patent- Generator with more output than input

[Jim Mac]

You do realize that this is unenforceable, right?
Lots of motors and generators use this setup in one form or another, magnetic transmissions and stuff  as well.

Part number 303 should be your dead giveaway that this ,as described, does not work,, 2:2,  3:3 or 4:4 making a difference in ratio,,, really?

Yes I realize the apparent "gain mechanism" is unrecognizable.  Surely Lenz Law will slow the rotor..  But the claim seems that his answer lies in the "metal enclosure or centrifuge structure".

How this differs from a generator shell, I do not know.  And a good chance it is completely bogus..

But the patent's dues have been paid and it is active still.  And IF the patent writer is not lying, his claims are all "Laboratory Tested"..

I am not recommending anyone blindly building this.  But when patent seeking, one would think if the patent is abandoned or the dues were not paid, the inventor lost hope in the device. So there's some type of credence to remain hopeful since the inventor obviously still believes the claim.