Join us in the search for Free Energy. Share your experiments and discoveries, post your build logs, and discuss.

We have a strict No-Troll policy. So you can post without fear of being ridiculed.

New Members- Check Your Spam Folder For Activation Link

Please read our Rules. Any problems or suggestions- Contact Us

 


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Patent- Generator with more output than input
#1
Here is a patent I found by Aston Gustavous Farquharson.  It caught my attention because it is active, and the dues have been paid continually.  And it clearly says many times, it self-sustains..  Whether or not I believe it is not decided, but here is what I got out of it after reading it, then making ChatGPT go over it with a fine tooth comb..

Although some details are not specifically mentioned, I believe it says this:
  • An Axial Flux design with Air Coils
  • Most descriptions portray more magnets than coils
  • High Speed Operation with Gears
  • And perhaps the magic key, is a "metal enclosure or centrifuge structure"

The patent notes that the "flux density and intensity" created by the centrifuge structure "lessens or eliminates any requirement of more energy...that traditionally limits the generation of large amounts of inexpensive electricity." This suggests the enclosure is more than just a containment device—it plays a direct role in mitigating drag and optimizing performance


Attached Files
.pdf   US10110109.pdf (Size: 2.82 MB / Downloads: 50)
Reply
#2
You do realize that this is unenforceable, right?
Lots of motors and generators use this setup in one form or another, magnetic transmissions and stuff as well.

Part number 303 should be your dead giveaway that this ,as described, does not work,, 2:2, 3:3 or 4:4 making a difference in ratio,,, really?
Reply
#3
(12-31-2024, 07:30 AM)webby1 Wrote: You do realize that this is unenforceable, right?
Lots of motors and generators use this setup in one form or another, magnetic transmissions and stuff  as well.

Part number 303 should be your dead giveaway that this ,as described, does not work,, 2:2,  3:3 or 4:4 making a difference in ratio,,, really?

Yes I realize the apparent "gain mechanism" is unrecognizable.  Surely Lenz Law will slow the rotor..  But the claim seems that his answer lies in the "metal enclosure or centrifuge structure".

How this differs from a generator shell, I do not know.  And a good chance it is completely bogus..

But the patent's dues have been paid and it is active still.  And IF the patent writer is not lying, his claims are all "Laboratory Tested"..

I am not recommending anyone blindly building this.  But when patent seeking, one would think if the patent is abandoned or the dues were not paid, the inventor lost hope in the device. So there's some type of credence to remain hopeful since the inventor obviously still believes the claim.
Reply
#4
I have already built motors like this, a very long time ago, and over at OU this was also built and tested a long time ago.
Reply
#5
(01-01-2025, 05:45 AM)webby1 Wrote: I have already built motors like this, a very long time ago, and over at OU this was also built and tested a long time ago.

I would like to see info on these past builds, especially how the " centrifuge structure" was constructed and designed. And tests with and without the  centrifuge structure.
Reply
#6
To achieve OU with a motor/generator is possible. I have several prototypes. I built 16 different versions, each one to address problems as they came up. There are two significant obstacles with a simple generator comprised of a rotor with coils on both sides. 1. Lenz and 2. the magnetic attraction of rotor magnets to coil cores. I have developed methods for dealing with both.

Tesla gave us instructions for lenz free generator coils and CEMF elimination in motor coils in his patent US512340A. A bifilar coil wound with two strands in parallel that are connected in series. Thane Heins patented such a coil that increases the coil capacitance, which blows my mind since the principle and that EXACT coil was clearly delineated in Tesla's patent. His coils can be lenz free, so his claim that they are is correct. But you can't JUST wind such a coil and suddenly be lenz free. There are three factors you MUST take into consideration. For more info, look up the resonance calculator shown at

https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/r...equency-lc

Look at Tesla's patent. When a coil is in a resonant condition it has no self induction, which means no Lens. Period. End of story. But you DON'T have to wind coils this way (which causes a problem OF ITS OWN, and is why Thane has been debunked) Every coil is lenz neutral at the CORRECT FREQUENCY as long as the other two variables are constant. Simple physics. I have a better method than either of those, but there are only 3 possible variables as demonstrated by the resonance calculator, so figure it out. So that takes care of Lenz. On to magnetic attraction.

Below are a couple videos I did years ago where I show a simple setup with one motor coil and one generator coil and a rotor with all north magnets. First I bias the motor and generator coils with a magnet on the back of each, and then I show what happens when I put a North magnet facing the north magnet on the rotor directly across from either a motor coil or a generator coil. I create a magnetic repulsion that neutralizes the attraction of the motor and generator cores to the rotor magnets. Magnetic neutralization with opposition or repulsion magnets. This is the SECOND obstacle to overcome. But I just showed you how to do it.

I have built a motor/generator combination and shared EVERYTHING on another forum. I took people step by step through its construction with dozens of videos I have since deleted. My generator puts out 1400-1600 watts on an input of less than 300 watts. The experts called me a liar and a fraud, so I quit posting there. I claimed it would output between 1800-2000 watts, and it will, with the original iron core coils, but they heat up in about 20-30 minutes of run time and melt the insulation off the coil wires. The new cores work, and can run all day.

I turned my generator over to my partners some time back for development because I am aware of its limitations, and a computer aided mechanism would be required to change inductance, capacitance or frequency ever time the LOAD CHANGES in order to keep everything in resonance and lenz free. However, it is fantastic for running a specific load at a constant speed as long as the load is not added to the generator until the correct rpm has been reached and is maintained. Running emergency lights and charging a second set of batteries while your inverter is running your refrigerator on a duplicate set is an example of an emergency setup everyone should have. This is perfect for that.

https://youtu.be/90t071rVfmE
https://youtu.be/nnKYlchUm5w

If you have questions, I'll be around. I might still have SOME videos of my generator somewhere. I definitely have pictures and I have a friend who replicated it, and have links to videos of his running between 1400-1600 watts. They were made for ME, so he wasn't trying to convince anyone of anything in the videos. Just showing me his progress.

I didn't mean his was running on between 1400-1600 watts. I meant it was outputting that amount.
Reply
#7
(01-01-2025, 04:32 PM)Turion Wrote: If you have questions, I'll be around. I might still have SOME videos of my generator somewhere. I definitely have pictures and I have a friend who replicated it, and have links to videos of his running between 1400-1600 watts. They were made for ME, so he wasn't trying to convince anyone of anything in the videos. Just showing me his progress.

I didn't mean his was running on between 1400-1600 watts. I meant it was outputting that amount.

Welcome.  I am interested in hearing more...

And do you have any info regarding the helpfulness of the "Enclosure"  which the patent mentions?  It clearly says, the enclosure helps output while lessening input requirements.  

Please post what you can share..
Reply
#8
(01-01-2025, 04:32 PM)Turion Wrote: If you have questions, I'll be around. I might still have SOME videos of my generator somewhere. I definitely have pictures and I have a friend who replicated it, and have links to videos of his running between 1400-1600 watts. They were made for ME, so he wasn't trying to convince anyone of anything in the videos. Just showing me his progress.

Hello Turion, I read your message with great excitement. Any more information you might have is very welcome. I have been working with solid state resonance for the past few months and what you write makes sense to me. I’d like to make a build just as a proof of concept of what you are writing about. We’ll see how much time i’ll have. Maybe I will be able to use a pulse motor I made for a Bedini SSG setup, it is just a rewound 12 cm pc fan, it has 4 poles, opposite poles are connected in series. Not sure what the inductance is, when I get to it, I’ll check it out.
Reply
#9
Sorry to take so long to get back here. Posting on forums is not a priority for me now.

I do not know what he meant by "enclosure" in the patent. Other than the casing for the motor, since his patent applied to motors and he did not apply these principles to generators. Although they are two sides of the same coin.

To have lenz neutral coils they must be in resonance, and this resonant circuit includes THE ATTACHED LOAD. So varying loads will drop you out of the lenz neutral window. The lenz calculator gave you the three variables you can control to achieve resonance. Inductance, Capacitance and Frequency.
Frequency is the size of the rotor, the number of magnets and the rpm. Change in rpm changes the frequency. This is the easiest to control. My machine does NOT have a motor controller, so I chose to adjust the coil capacitance to achieve lenz neutral state with a constant load at a constant frequency.


I did an interesting experiment years ago. I connected two coils to a timed pulsing circuit so they would pulse as motor coils at the exact moment a rotor magnet was aligned. Then I took one of the coils away from the rotor (still connected to the pulsing circuit, and hand held a magnet (same size as the rotor magnet0 in front of the coil at the same distance as the rotor magnet was from the coil. I could feel the change in attraction/repulsion in the magnet as the coil was pulsed. I learned a lot from that very simple experiment about the relationship between a rotor coil core and the magnets moving past it.

https://youtu.be/90t071rVfmE
https://youtu.be/nnKYlchUm5w

I don't know if anybody here was around when RomeroUK made a big splash amongst free energy folks, but I am pretty sure he learned some or all of the things I demonstrate in these two videos.
Reply
#10
I've had a read through, and this is a mechanical version of Floyd Sweets VTA. Alternate rotating field, bifilar coils and I believe the enclosure is going to be anything that can wrap around the magnets and rotors to contain and maximise flux density.

I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a cancelled Lenz effect, is actually the absence of a magnetic field, which is why Sweet used bifilar to capture the resulting power from resonating magnets. And in this patents case, the resonance of a pair of magnets, has been replaced with a mechanical rotation of them instead to effect the coils in the same manner.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)