Dinámica de flujos en sistema Figuera

[Jim Mac]

I had mention this to Jim Mac and he did not know anything about this charging of the batteries 
he said " the output would be hooked up to the input and feed itself
and I read that also.

So my question was - could this be the real power source to the non-moving transforming power device. and not so much the system of design of reproducing the effect of a moving dynamo system in a non-moving transformer system.

yes, every patent says this same clause in 1 way or another:  "From this current is derived a small part to excite the machine converting it in self-exciting and to operate the small motor which moves the brush and the switch; the external current supply, this is the feeding current, is removed and the machine continue working without any help indefinitely."

Besides Figuera's excellent credentials, his partner Buforn  passed a “Test of Practical Implementation of the Invention” before the patent office and his official agents to testify  the working of his 1910 patent (patent No. 40706). The report is available but it gives very few details of the test. All Buforn´s patents were in force until 1914 when he stopped paying further annual fees

https://figueragenerator.files.wordpress...ention.pdf

This is one of the only claims that has this much backing and legitimacy behind it. Nikola Tesla spoke of him, his reputation, patent office tests, and a clear gain mechanism involving how the reciprocal field affects the primary from a shrinking magnetic field. 

I digress to say- either the patents hid pertinent information when written- or the patents were altered by those who do not want this info public. But with the clues we do have, I believe we can figure it out.  

This is why I spend the time, money and resources on this project.