Hello,
I was experimenting a bit out of boredom and came up with this experiment:
I disassembled an old EI transformer (220V/12V). Using the E-shaped parts and the 220V winding, I made an electromagnet. I connected a starting electrolytic capacitor to it to create an LC circuit with a resonant frequency of about 10 Hz. I pulsed the LC circuit using PWM at its resonant frequency. From the I-shaped parts of the transformer, I made a block, which I brought close to the pulsing electromagnet. The I-block oscillated strongly in my hand, and when I moved it closer to the electromagnet, it stuck to it and wouldn’t come off until I turned off the pulsing (8V, 250mA, duty cycle 45%).
Using a multimeter and oscilloscope, I found that the LC circuit consumed roughly the same amount of power, whether the oscillating I-block was near the electromagnet (oscillating strongly) or stuck to it completely, or even when it was absent—any difference in power consumption was negligible, despite me applying a significant braking force with my hand.
Now, here’s my question:
Imagine we have a switched reluctance motor (SRM) where the rotation of the rotor does not influence the magnetic field of the excitation coils with an opposing magnetic field (unlike standard motors). Instead, it operates on the same principle as my vibrating I-block. If we connected the phase coils of the SRM motor into LC circuits and pulsed them at the resonant frequency of the LC circuits, what efficiency could such an SRM motor achieve?
Does anyone have experience with SRM motors?
I want to thoroughly test the energy efficiency of SRM motors.
I understand the physical principle of generating mechanical energy (the motion of a conductor in a magnetic field when current flows through it, or the motion of a magnet in a magnetic field induced by the conductor). By moving the conductor’s loop, its magnetic field affects the magnetic field of the other element, thereby causing increased electrical energy consumption.
But in the case of SRM motors, the situation is different. There is only one electromagnet, and the rotor is magnetically neutral. Therefore, the motion of the rotor does not influence the magnetic field of the excitation coil.
I have verified this through an experiment with an electromagnet in an LC circuit, where I allowed a metallic object to vibrate. The energy consumption without the vibrating object was the same as the energy consumption with the vibrating object. In both cases, the consumption was only due to Joule losses, and the mechanical energy produced appeared to be "extra."
That’s why I want to try connecting a two-phase stepper SRM motor to an LC circuit, where one part of the oscillation would pass rectified through one coil and the other part through the second coil (with an initial mechanical impulse provided by hand to start rotation). I want to monitor the energy consumption of the supplied pulses in the state without the rotor, with the rotor stationary, and during rotor rotation. Then I plan to connect a generator (e.g., a cheap BLDC motor), rectify the output, and measure the generated energy.
Equations describing the motion of a conductor in a magnetic field talk about the force acting on the conductor in the field but say nothing about a magnetically neutral ferromagnetic object affected by the induced magnetic field.
The result of my experiment with the electromagnet in an LC circuit suggests that if we were to use a superconductor and a lossless magnetic core in the LC circuit, it would oscillate indefinitely, and by placing an object made of lossless magnetic material near the electromagnet in the LC circuit, it would generate mechanical energy seemingly "out of nothing."
AI claims that SRM motors can operate with an efficiency of 95%—but that calculation considers only mechanical efficiency. Joule losses are not accounted for. I want to verify whether SRM motors could operate analogously to a heat pump, generating mechanical energy from something we currently don’t understand.
Hello everyone. I've finally decided to just release this information to the general public. Getting a patent is too expensive for me.
In this zip file I explain how you can make free energy with simple circuitboard components.
MODERATOR EDITED THIS POST
This post Broke the Rules of the community as the uploaded file was jammed-packed with the author's religious views and conspiracies.
There was 1 section speaking of free energy which claims a battery, coil, and capacitor can make free energy, which concluded by saying
"I have not been able to design a circuit which does this. But, someone else out there will be able to do so. "
If the original poster wishes to just paste the Free-Energy parts in this thread for discussion, that is FINE.. But this is NOT the place to preach religious views or much conspiracy talk. And we frown upon asking members to download a ZIP FILE that contains a simple .txt file. The "FREE ENERGY" portions of the text file can simply be pasted to the forum without making members download questionable files and sift through pages and pages of unrelated ramblings.
Andrea Rossi has announced a partnership with a strong company that will be manufacturing the E-Cats in a 350,000 square meter facility and he expects them to be ready for delivery this year - 2025. That sounds like great news as this is essentially a free energy cold fusion device. I haven't listened to the entire video announcement but I got to the point where he said he expects them to be ready for delivery this year. It is claimed to be "low initial costs, zero fuel expenses, and a long lifespan without harmful emissions". Could this finally be the year for a great alternative energy source to made available to the public?
Here is a patent I found by Aston Gustavous Farquharson. It caught my attention because it is active, and the dues have been paid continually. And it clearly says many times, it self-sustains.. Whether or not I believe it is not decided, but here is what I got out of it after reading it, then making ChatGPT go over it with a fine tooth comb..
Although some details are not specifically mentioned, I believe it says this:
An Axial Flux design with Air Coils
Most descriptions portray more magnets than coils
High Speed Operation with Gears
And perhaps the magic key, is a "metal enclosure or centrifuge structure"
The patent notes that the "flux density and intensity" created by the centrifuge structure "lessens or eliminates any requirement of more energy...that traditionally limits the generation of large amounts of inexpensive electricity." This suggests the enclosure is more than just a containment device—it plays a direct role in mitigating drag and optimizing performance
Waste Spark Removal Briggs Mower Engine For Hydrogen Conversions
I completed building the circuit for eliminating waste spark. It's the plug in bread board type, not soldered. It's easier to make adjustments later. Two photos for you today. I have handful of different magnet Hall sensors to try out and see which one should be used on engine with NORTH pole. Some of them are industrial with cables. Three wire type as +Vcc , grnd, and signal out. Most Halls are used for South pole reception. You have to bend over the Hall for the rear side use, or reverse, and mount with bracket. I will use hand movable magnet north pole only for first tests. Then to switch over to my revolving wooden bench flywheel with magnet , Magnetron, and spark plug. First yellow Led is first state (Fire) , the red Led is 2nd state with relay switch on that shorts ignition to ground BEFORE magnet reaches T.D.C. Then next passing point is reset back to first state fire. The other guy on Youtube who built his soldered type circuit years ago has my same name Russell. His board is similar to mine - not copied. I designed it myself. Plastic board put in miniature vise with strong lamp and use needle nose pliers. With 9v battery use, I design small circuits with 2 ma type, .002A led's. Most Led's are 20ma .020A. The battery lasts longer, but those are expensive and are special order. You just change the resistors. Of course, 2 batteries can be put in parallel for more time. Yes, I'm still working on the S1R9A9M9 system. 'Questions?
I'm thinking about building a unit to test for joules/energy in and out of supposed free energy circuits.
I would like to use supercaps to feed in - and not batteries - because I think supercaps may lack ambiguity about energy used in contrast to batteries. Thus, you have various Bedini type gadgets in which there can be skepticism about quick surface charges or other electrochemical things that may give inaccurate ideas about how much was used or generated. Battery use looks to give messy estimations and may cause some to simply walk away from the idea, simply because a battery is a circuit element ( regardless of how long you let the thing run)
If the capacitor values get too impractical even for brief tests, then perhaps some sort of higher voltage caps could be used, with the output stepped down. Or in the other direction, perhaps some sort of Joule Thief could be used to complete a brief test, without too much voltage dip
The basic idea here is provide an extremely accurate way of measuring - using a before and after voltage reading, coupled with the formula for charge.
However, if I have to use a supercap, are they extremely reliable as to detecting charge levels? Are they no different from other capacitors with electrons bound on surfaces with no electrochemical activity compromising the readings? (like batteries)
This is just a little experiment, to see if I can duplicate this magnet setup in a coil..
When we place a small ring magnet inside a larger ring magnet, we get 2 opposite and distinct poles on each side.. And I am sure we all seen the videos of this configuration causing magnetic locking..
In this magnet setup, the inside is North and the outside is South.. So we have 2 poles on either side, making 4 poles.
Can this be done with a coil?
I will find out. I will use a flat bobbin that is like a pancake coil. It will not be only 1 layer though, but much wider than height. I will start winding a few hundred turns 1 way, then reverse and wind the outside the other way.
The aim is to simply see if it will mimic the magnet setup. If it does, I have some tests I plan on trying
Here is a different look at energy from someone I've followed on Facebook for quite some time - Steven B Halls.
The torus, I believe is at the heart of the matter, and hopefully the following insights may spark an idea.
A symbolism framework.
(Repost from a year ago)
1. Most symbolism is about the torus, the building block of creation. Not dieties or kings. Older generations of archeologists did not know about the torus, and local people living at ancient sites have forgotten and prefer diety stories.
2. Most symbolism is about energy that makes everything work. In particular, symbolism teaches about energy flows that are higher-density, aka etheric, undetectable by us. "Higher density" means it's like energy from heaven, or in the core of a torus.
3. The center core of a torus is a high-density region known as the void. It only seems empty to us in our reality.
4. Energy flux can change attributes when passing through the core. High-density can become normal-density or visa versa. Weak inflow at the south can become stronger when it has north outflow into the typical torus outer spherical flow patterns.
5. In addition to the flow vertically from south inflow to north outflow, there is a horizontal flow that rotates, inflow on one side, outflow on the other. Modern physics doesn't know much about this, but it's the "torsion field", "scalar wave", tempic or longitudinal wave and it causes the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
6. In addition to the vertical and horizontal flows, there are side flows from outside the torus, always higher-density, usually one side flows upward an the other side flows downward. Part of these flows can be drawn into the core of the torus, and then exit in various ways: on the opposite side, on the same side, or getting into the central flow.
7. What flows as units of energy, are actual smaller tori. They can move in a flow and be considered the ‘flux’.
8. Tori can crosslink with each other to form structures. 2D sheets, tubes, donuts and larger torus structures are common. Infinity shapes and weirder shapes are less common.
9. A torus has "barriers" made of 2D sheets of crosslinked tori, one barrier surrounds the core and another barrier surrounds the outer torus flow. Some energy sensitive people seem to be able to feel these boundaries. An analogy its like a bubble or balloon membrane.
10. Higher-density flows don’t usually interact with lower-density barriers, and just pass through. But a flow of same density as a barrier needs to pass through a portal /inlet/outlet. Portals and barriers are often visible on symbolism.
11. Human figures can represent the core of a torus, and various flows and connections are shown with arms, legs, clothing and handheld objects. When you see a human within a diagram of a "biomagnetic field", it's usually not about a literal human, that human represents the core flow going through the torus.
12. Some symbolism shows entire higher-density realities, (eg, heaven), in the top region of a pictogram layout. Some layouts also show lower-density than us. Usually our-reality is in the middle of a layout.
13. There are people who know all of this, and they create modern art called esoteric, surreal, etc. Some get their knowledge through wealthy-family-funded teachers and others get intuitive realizations about it. Their knowledge vastly exceeds the writings from famous writers like Manly Hall or Rudolph Steiner, who are mostly wrong.
14. Words and writings beside symbolism pictograms cannot be trusted. They are usually disinformation to support “stories”. Books from famous authors cannot be trusted. Their fame and success is probably manufactured because the information is wrong.
15. Small things is one way that symbolism marks something as etheric / high-density. That includes: what looks like sun rays, when they are thin lines and closely packed, they are high-density versus thick straight rays like spikes are our-density-reality. Necklace beads that are big versus tiny beads. Normal size human subject in the middle versus very small people on the sides. Red fruit Apple versus grapes or pomengranite. Flower open versus flower bud.
16. Portals are a path through a barrier that separates one density from a higher or lower density. Portal symbols are often ring shaped, or a loop, or a sphere, or a round shape like the sun or moon. When you see any ring or round shape in symbolism, it is probably a portal where some flow is entering or exiting. Why is that hand holding a laurel wreath ring? Why is that snaketail making a loop?
17. Certain animals are the "cast of characters" used in symbolism, and they never refer to the literal animal. A snake does not mean any kind of literal snake, it shows a flow direction, and it can make shapes like loops, rings, and pleats. You have to memorize the common ones when starting out, but you can gradually figure out the rest. Lion is outflow, Bull is inflow. Long-neck-birds are outflow. A Cup or bowl is inflow.
18. There is no good or bad in symbolism. Those concepts come from words and writings placed on or near symbol pictograms that are designed to mislead. Yes, hiding the real meaning has been part of symbolism from the very start.
19. Pouring water shows a flow direction downward. Fire is usually an upward flow direction (of energy flow, not literal fire or literal water or oil). Wind blowing out of a mouth means a flow, but not always outward. Blood is often a downward flow, and the red color indicates it is higher-density energy flow.
20. When tori stack vertically above each other, the side flows outside the lower torus, will tend to cross over to the other side when they go around the higher torus. Where those 2 tori touch each other, there is often a presumed small portal torus straddling both of them, helping to keep them in place. Seeing side-flows enter the horizontal plane of a small portal torus and then cross diagonally before they exit, creates the very common "X" flow pattern that is found a lot in symbolism.
21. Everything in the universe works with pressure. Torus outflow creates pressure. The flux coming out the North side diverges to escape the pressure, which explains the upper half rounded shape of a torus. The lower half that has curved inflow back into the core, it won't work unless there is zero pressure at the core. Inflowing converging flux would have increasing density and pressure, but there is a density threshold where flux and matter disappear from our reality.
22. A zero-pressure void would suck in flux from all directions, which doesn't give the fully rounded torus shape. Barrier membranes must also be there to achieve the familiar shape. The south inflow zone creates an inflow vortex and it is often depicted in symbolism as an open door.
23. The concept of flux disappearing from our reality when it exceeds a density threshold, has real-world examples: A black hole. Quantum tunnelling. Shaped charge munition (a converging liquid copper striking a tank, makes a lot of steel disappear).
24. Torus symbols with concentric rings inside the outer barrier, or like a labyrinth, are very common. It seems to indicate stratification of energy density within a torus and may have entered symbolism from observing iron filings in a magnetic field. It is very common on petroglyphs.
25. A Portal is an inlet or outlet across a torus barrier. Half-circles, half-spheres, and domes that are half-spheres are portal symbols. When one circle is halfway straddling the barrier of another bigger circle, it is acting as a portal symbol, with half in one reality and the other half in the next reality. Not just with circles, those concentric rings style of torus symbols can also be half-overlapping something, and we only see half of the concentric rings (or labyrinth). Half-animals, like half-a-bull are portal symbols too.
Generated with regular low efficiency electrolysis ,when neutral air is pumped under the ions solution of electrolyte. Used in the Outback by Australian solders returning from WW2. They brought the data back with them after finding the Germans were experimenting with vehicle engines in motor pools. With no power lines in the back lands, the engines powering the generators would self run on this increased energy content fuel gases. Check it out. Nitrogen Hydroxide as an aid for Hydrogen + Oxygen water cells.
Archie Blue, retired engineer of New Zealand factory for electroplating of scissors, had, in the past, US Patent on discs cell of porous aluminum electrodes electrolysis cell with air pumped in from bottom. Dual type fuel gases evolve with the other increased efficiency of "clean sweep". Some of the neutral air wipes the stuck ions clean off , so as the maximum efficiency is achieved. He converted 3 cars to self run on water.40 amps draw from battery, alternator recharges.
Posted by: Sandy - 12-09-2024, 07:09 AM - Forum: Alien and UFO
- No Replies
Hi All. Some years ago I enjoyed watching a collection of anti-gravity experiments/demonstrations on YouTube by a presenter with an Australian accent. The videos were numbered in thier titles and there was some ethereal music playing in the intro or background. The video looked like it had been shot on handycam or VHS and converted to digital. I did not subscribe and cannot find the channel. Is this familiar to any of the members here? If so, can you please link the channel here? Thanks, Sandy.