Mooker.Com- Opensource Free Energy Overunity Forum

Hi Jim
Won't the slurry just have a set value of resistance?
Be the same everywhere.
Not sure I understand
If you can rotate the coil leads through a varying volume of slurry that should cause gradual increase and decrease
Interesting idea hope it works

(11-30-2023, 04:44 AM)Shylo Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Jim
Won't the slurry just have a set value of resistance?
Be the same everywhere.
Not sure I understand
If you can rotate the coil leads through a varying volume of slurry that should cause gradual increase and decrease
Interesting idea hope it works

Hey Bro,

I would think that distance variations would alter the resistance.  If the mixture maintained a uniform amount of conductivity throughout, just like a piece of wire, the longer the wire, the more resistance. 

I poured some iron power in a cup alone and it does not conduct at all when dry.  Then I covered it with mineral oil, and again it was not conductive.  

I've been examining the dynamics of creating this high-phase rotation, and I definitely want 9 smooth 1 polarity waves, just like the figuera device does.  But how else to make 9 waves smooth and overlap?  Avoiding the resistance jump that is created when connecting and dropping contacts?

Regarding the polarities, 1 polarity or dual polarity should both work to create rotation. I think dual polarity would double the frequency of the rotation, but be much more difficult to sync the waves. 

I might have to start experimenting with sending DC pulses into inductors (as I heavily experimented with in the past) to mold the square waves into waves that rise to peak fluently.  Then I can control each one.  But I am open to other ideas

Thinking about it a little more-  creating the waves with reactive power would probably be much more advantageous anyway.  Others have suggested this when working on the Figuera device.   We can possible smooth out the waves and use much less input over burning to heat.

Jim, i think you can use a SIDAC for switching and take advantage of negative resistance they introduce.

After much experimenting and more understanding, I am coming back to Poly-Phase..

I have about exhausted my attempts with 2 phase 90 degree difference.  That does indeed create 1 moment in time where we have peak voltage and no drag, but only 1 precise moment, which is not ideal.  The idea is there and theory is solid, it's just too difficult to zero-in on it with that configuration.

90 degrees is indeed the magic angle where the magic can happen, as an alternator's induced waveform is 90 degrees phase difference from the position of the rotor.  But this does not mean we have to use only 2 phases to get that 90 degrees difference.  

Lets look at 9 phases..  When we connect 9 phases in series, the power is still accumulative.  But 3 phase is NOT accumulative..

What I mean is, if we series connect 9 phases, all 9 waves are on the same side of the zero line at the same time. So they can be series connected.  The output should be comparable to if we harvested each phase individually. But 3 phase does NOT occupy the same side of the zero line at the same time, thus if we series connected them, it becomes destructive. 

Now back to the 90 degrees, when we series the phases, superposition happens and they average to form 1 sinewave.  Looking at the image below, when they average, the peak happens between wave 4 and 5, which is exactly half of 9.  So the output waveform will still be 90 degrees whether we use 2 phases or 9!  

[attachment=364]

The whole 90 degrees thing is valid, but there is more to it.  When a physical coil is in rotation, it is infinite phases, fully utilizing every nanometer between 0 and 90.  It's infinite sinewaves merged into 1 sinewave traveling through spacetime at the speed of light.  Even a still object is traveling at the speed of light, but that doesn't mean it's travelling through space at the speed of light- just travelling through space-TIME.

Counter-EMF (drag) can only be fully eliminated if we use unlimited phases like true motion does.  But we do not have to eliminate all of it to achieve Overunity..  We just have to eliminate enough of it to cover the losses in the system then any extra is Overunity.

Now creating 9 uniform sinewaves is proving to be a difficult task.  But I think I found a way..  The printer is cooking and it will take me a bit of time, as I have a bunch of large things to print, and a lot of coil winding coming my way.

I agree that a coil in motion see's a rise to peak,then fall to zero
During rise cemf also rises countering motion
But I'm not sure if this is Lorentz maybe in certain scenarios
Shorting a coil just before peak causes a big spike
If you can channel that back to the input you may achieve your goal
I think it may be possible with electronic switching but I don't have those abilities

No matter how many phases you use, the power lines (if any exist) of your virtual rotating magnetic field will not cross the secondary wire at an angle of 90 degrees.  Therefore won't inducted in it EMF.

(12-12-2023, 03:50 AM)chief colbacict Wrote: [ -> ]No matter how many phases you use, the power lines (if any exist) of your virtual rotating magnetic field will not cross the secondary wire at an angle of 90 degrees.  Therefore won't inducted in it EMF.

The principle of superposition states that every charge in space creates an electric field at point independent of the presence of other charges in that medium. The resultant electric field is a vector sum of the electric field due to individual charges. Superposition can occur in both magnetic fields and electric fields.

A generator's primary rotating coil can be look at as unlimited phases in which superposition merges those unlimited phases into 1 smooth phase. 

Must Remember- there is Constructive and Destructive Superposition.

If the two waves are in phase, there is constructive interference: the resultant amplitude is large, equal to the sum of the two wave amplitudes. If the two waves are in antiphase, there is destructive interference: the resultant amplitude is small, equal to the difference between the two wave amplitudes.

3 Phase is DESTRUCTIVE.  The outputs can not be added together without rectification. 9 Phase is CONSTRUCTIVE- 9 phases can be series together additively to create 1 phase

I am closing in on the 9 phase generator!  It's not perfect, but I like the way it's turning out.  Soon Now!

(11-30-2023, 11:10 AM)Jim Mac Wrote: [ -> ]Thinking about it a little more-  creating the waves with reactive power would probably be much more advantageous anyway.  Others have suggested this when working on the Figuera device.   We can possible smooth out the waves and use much less input over burning to heat.

As for the slurry idea; there’s always mercury as DePalma used.